« It's that Type of Place | OK, back to home | An Anniversary »

Tuesday, November 30, 2004

Conflicted

Back in college, when I was competing in the classroom with students who were better educated and more wise to the world, I made peace with the fact that I’ll never have anything unique to offer. Everything I think has been thought. Everything I feel has been felt. Everything I say has been said.

Is that depressing?

Or is that comforting?

Answer: It’s both.

It begs the question. If I have nothing to offer that hasn’t already been offered time and time again, what is there to live for?

In my ultra-religious days, a common catchword — heard on just about a daily basis — was “struck.” As in, “I was walking in the woods praying when it really struck me that…”

Well, I’m struck here by the fact that I judge the worth of my life based on what I have to offer, what I have to give others. Is that wrong? I think, partially, yes it is wrong. While I don’t want to live a selfish, self-centered life, I also shouldn’t feel like I have to offer a certain, unique something (whatever that is) in order to feel significant.

One of the characters in “The Great Gatsby” is described as a “jack of all trades, master of none.” I remember that because that is me. There are many things I can do adequately, even more than adequately. But there is nothing I truly excel at, no real claim to fame. That, occasionally, is depressing.

It’s depressing because I’m materialistic. I want to be known as the best at something. I want it to make me rich, famous, etc. etc. It’s a desire I often deny, saying that I don’t care about material things.

But I am the offspring of my father and of my grandfather — two people who very much judge their own worth based on the market value of their belongings. I can’t seem to shake that genetic curse. In my most ascetic moods, I’ve started filling out applications for the Peace Corps, wanting to live a lifestyle of forced asecticism. In other moods, I log onto monster.com and search for jobs that will line my pockets a little better than a meager PR agency.

These are the conflicts I deal with. My lack of excellence in any one area is at turns depressing and comforting. I dream of crushed velvet pillows but force myself to think of cardboard.

There likely is no resolution. At least not now. Not at 23, when yes, I’m still figuring out what I want to be when I grew up, where I’ll fit in society. We all compare ourselves to the Joneses down the street. I’m just wondering, Which Joneses do I want to compare myself to?

Posted by Aaron on November 30, 2004 8:10 PM

Comments:

I agree. I too have no real trade to offer to this world, and I fear that it will hold me back. For 17, I've a long ways to live, and with an outlook just that, it's tough. But as I think the real path to happiness isn't with materials, but how much you enjoy what you do. I know I could be a doctor, or anything really that pays well or doesn't... but that's not what I want to do. So where do I pick to go? Art. Living in poverty (well, hopefully not), and striving to just get by. I'm not a great artist, but I can bring new means of seeing to the table... and I truely enjoy it.

Maybe you should re-evaluate your job. Do you love it? Could you love another job better?

Steven
November 30, 2004 8:57 PM

As always, you've stolen my thoughts -- not that I would've expressed them.

sam
November 30, 2004 10:53 PM

I enjoyed this post Aaron. I think more people than we think experience those feelings. I wrestled with these thoughts numerous times over the last sixth months. And I've got nothing!

Sidenote: If you ever get the opportunity to see the opera The Great Gatsby take it. I thought it would suck but it was really amazing...even for opera. : )

skoutz
December 1, 2004 12:07 AM

http://www.tshirthell.com/store/product.php?productid=182

Matt B.
December 1, 2004 11:36 AM

Aaron, I think you're confusing being selfish with acting in your own best interest. If offering "things" to others makes you feel good, go with it.

I reconciled wanting to be the "best" at something a long time ago. Because, honestly, I don't think the "best" can be achieved. "Pretty darn good" can, though. Sure, Tiger Woods has a big head knowing that he can hit a golf ball a little bit better, sometimes, than everyone in the world, but does that make him feel "good"? I doubt that knowing he's the "best" makes him feel any better than you do, Aaron, when you're in the arms of someone you love, or when you're offering things to other people.

The constant state of wanting to "be better" you write about has one casualty...knowing you are as good as you can be RIGHT NOW. Personally, I'd rather make do with what I have now and let the future take care of itself.

Don't worry about your legacy...if you do the right things now, without worrying about it, your great legacy will write itself.

Dunner
December 1, 2004 12:11 PM